Skip to content

Hard-technology discovery audit

Branch: development Baseline: last commit shared with main3169eb15 (merge-base) Window: 22 commits on development since baseline (AGIF/ORS/RFUMS/CIRCLE + Phase 2 candidate pipeline + ORS internal-program reports) Mode: audit only — no repository content modified, no resources/relationships created, no candidates promoted Related: Repository-wide refactor governance · Candidate preservation implementation · Hypertext & reciprocity audit


1. Executive summary

Since the last commit shared with main, the repository-wide IKaC refactors have produced massive growth in the grants layer (grant_count 39 → 922, +883) and a working candidate-preservation pipeline, but negligible growth in promoted physical-research-infrastructure pages.

Headline finding: 0 new hard-technology resource pages were created. All infrastructure "promotions" were typed grant→facility links onto pre-existing pages (6 links across 4 facilities). Every genuinely new physical-infrastructure signal (labs, clinics, equipment) was preserved as a candidate, not promoted — which is governance-correct, but means the original ORS mission of discovering and documenting physical research infrastructure is currently bottlenecked at promotion, not discovery.

Mission dimension Verdict
Discover infrastructure Working — 9+ hard-tech labs/facilities surfaced as candidates
Document infrastructure Lagging — 0 new facility pages; existing pages enriched only
Connect infrastructure Partial — 6 new grant→facility links; reciprocity manual/sparse
Validate infrastructure Partial — verification refreshed on 4 facilities; candidates unverified

The dominant new content is grants and administrative program structure, not physical resources. Infrastructure discovery is concentrated in AGIF award reports; the internal-grant / paid-leave / URAP packets were almost entirely administrative.


2. Promoted hard-technology resources

No new resource pages. The following existing hard-technology facilities received new evidence-backed grant→facility links (status: implemented):

Resource Type New link(s) Grant Source packet Evidence Confidence
CDM-009 NexGeN Lab networking/computing lab GRL-017 GRA-878 agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF appendix: "Next Generation Networking Lab: NexGeN"; PI Oteafy; $100k high
CDM-014 HPCC HPC / computing infrastructure GRL-018 GRA-916 agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF: "DePaul High-Performance Compute Cloud"; $300k high
UNI-006 DIGI Lab instructional game/innovation lab GRL-019 GRA-921 agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF: DIGI Lab Working Model; $99,993 high
CDM-011 MedIX / VIDA informatics/imaging research lab GRL-013, GRL-015, GRL-016 GRA-052, GRA-055, GRA-407 ors-annual-reports-2020-2025 Featured/annual narratives name MedIX REU high/medium

Provenance: data/grant_resource_links.yaml; reciprocal prose added on CDM-011. 4 facilities, 6 links, 0 new pages.


3. Candidate hard-technology resources (preserved, not promoted)

From data/review/resource_candidates.yaml and packet extracted/candidates.yaml:

Candidate Type Status Source packet Evidence Confidence Existing page Record
Immersion Lab (Interaction Design Research Space) laboratory candidate agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF FY24-25; PI Ramsay; $99,980 medium none RC-001
CoBaAB Lab (Computational Biology & Applied Bioinformatics) laboratory candidate agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF; PI Ramaraj medium none (≠ CDM-011?) RC-002
Virtual & Augmented Reality Communication Lab (VARC) laboratory candidate agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF $78,400; Booth/McEwan medium none RC-003
Assisted Locomotion Laboratory laboratory candidate agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF FY21-22; PI Huzaifa medium CDM-006 (ambiguous) RC-004
Cybersecurity Clinic facility candidate agif-reports-2018-2025 AGIF FY23-24; PI Spears low CDM-004/007 unconfirmed RC-005
Connolly Lab laboratory candidate ors-annual-reports-2020-2025 Featured NIH HSV — Connolly laboratory expertise high none RC-006
Anatomy and Physiology Lab laboratory candidate internal-grant-reports auto-extracted from report text medium none packet candidates.yaml
Tobacco Use Research Lab laboratory candidate rfums-dpu-grants-2024-2023 auto-extracted (PDF) medium none packet candidates.yaml
Argonne National Laboratory laboratory (external) candidate (matched) rfums-dpu-grants-2024-2023 auto-extracted; matched EXT-003 high EXT-003 packet candidates.yaml
National Cancer Institute institute (external funder) candidate rfums-dpu-grants-2024-2023 auto-extracted medium none packet candidates.yaml
Resuscitation Institute institute (external) candidate rfums-dpu-grants-2024-2023 auto-extracted medium none packet candidates.yaml
DePaul Asylum & Immigration Legal Clinic facility (non-tech) candidate ors-annual-reports-2020-2025 ORS Tier C listing medium none RC-007

Highest-value unpromoted DePaul hard-tech labs: Immersion Lab, CoBaAB Lab, VARC, Assisted Locomotion Lab, Connolly Lab (5 with grant-backed evidence and no page).


4. Equipment discoveries

Effectively none. No equipment-collection candidates were produced. The closest signals are infrastructure-as-facility (HPCC/HPC Cloud → CDM-014, already a page). The candidate registry's equipment: 1 summary counter is not backed by a discrete equipment candidate record. Gap: equipment/instrumentation discovery is the weakest layer — no source packet in this window itemized instruments, fabrication tools, or equipment inventories.


5. Facility discoveries

  • DePaul research facilities/labs surfaced: 7 candidate labs (§3) + 1 clinic (Cybersecurity Clinic).
  • External facilities matched: Argonne National Laboratory → EXT-003 (high confidence) — confirms the registry-backed matcher works.
  • Repeatedly appearing facilities (multi-source): MedIX/VIDA (CDM-011) appears across ORS featured + annual + AGIF (CoBaAB ambiguity) — strongest multi-source facility signal, already promoted via 3 GRLs. NexGeN (CDM-009) and HPCC (CDM-014) appear in AGIF + existing pages.
  • Non-DePaul/administrative facilities (low map value): National Cancer Institute, Resuscitation Institute (external funders), Asylum & Immigration Legal Clinic (non-technology).

6. Infrastructure relationship audit

For the promoted/candidate hard-tech resources:

Resource People Grants Pubs Outputs Programs Partners Status
CDM-009 NexGeN Oteafy (PER-004, via grant) GRA-878 (GRL-017) AGIF grant link implemented; person link candidate/indirect
CDM-014 HPCC Picher (unresolved) GRA-916 (GRL-018) AGIF grant link implemented; person unresolved
UNI-006 DIGI Lab Klass (PER, via grant) GRA-921 (GRL-019) AGIF grant link implemented
CDM-011 MedIX Raicu (PER-015) GRA-052/055/407 implemented; reciprocal prose present
Connolly Lab (cand.) Sarah Connolly (unregistered) NIH HSV candidate (REL-002)
Assisted Locomotion (cand.) Huzaifa (PER-007) GRA-913 AGIF candidate (REL-001/004)

Relationship records: data/review/relationship_candidates.yaml (REL-001..010). Implemented infra edges: REL-APL-001..003 + GRL-013/015/016. Candidate infra edges: REL-001, REL-002, REL-004, REL-010. Rejected: REL-003 (Sharevski→Secure Design Lab — narrative did not name the lab).


7. Reciprocity audit

  • New reciprocal links created: ~1 explicit (CDM-011 reciprocal prose for Raicu/MedIX); person↔office reciprocity via people.yaml (Miller↔UNI-001, Raicu↔CDM-011/UNI-001).
  • Missing reciprocal links identified:
  • CDM-009 / CDM-014 / UNI-006 pages do not back-reference their funding grants in a "Linked Relationship IDs"/Documented-Relationships sense (grant→facility is one-way via GRL).
  • HPCC (CDM-014) PI Picher unresolved → no person↔facility reciprocity.
  • Candidate labs (Immersion, CoBaAB, VARC, Connolly, Assisted Locomotion) have no pages, so no reciprocal structure can exist yet.
  • ORS (UNI-001) → internal programs (URC/QIC/PSC/URAP) is preserved as candidate REL-010 only (programs have no pages).
  • Automated reciprocity remains deferred to Phase 3 (no tool computes it).

8. Source effectiveness analysis

Source type Infrastructure Equipment Capability Mostly administrative?
AGIF award reports Highest — 3 promoted facilities + 5 candidate labs/clinic none innovation/instructional no
ORS annual reports Medium — Connolly Lab, MedIX links, clinics none research administration partly
RFUMS / DPU-RFU packets Medium — Argonne (matched), Tobacco Use Lab, institutes none AI/health research partly
Internal grant reports Low — 1 weak auto "Anatomy & Physiology Lab" none internal-funding admin yes
Paid leave reports Lowest — 1 parse artifact none faculty leave admin yes
URAP reports None none undergrad research funding yes
CIRCLE report None (program/curricular) none curriculum indexing yes

Conclusion: grant/award packets that name projects and labs (AGIF above all) are by far the most productive infrastructure sources. Aggregate ORS program reports (internal grants, paid leave, URAP, CIRCLE) are administrative and yield little physical-resource signal.


9. Gaps and missed opportunities

  • Discovered but not promoted (hard-tech): Immersion Lab, CoBaAB Lab, VARC, Assisted Locomotion Lab, Connolly Lab, Anatomy & Physiology Lab, Tobacco Use Research Lab (7).
  • Equipment collections discovered but not promoted: none discovered — systemic gap; no source itemized instruments/fabrication/equipment.
  • Facilities repeatedly appearing across sources: MedIX/VIDA (promoted), NexGeN, HPCC.
  • Insufficient evidence: Cybersecurity Clinic (low), CoBaAB vs MedIX disambiguation, Assisted Locomotion ↔ CDM-006 ambiguity.
  • Lacking reciprocal links: CDM-009, CDM-014, UNI-006 (grant back-refs); all candidate labs.
  • Lacking people links: CDM-014 (PI Picher unresolved); candidate labs (Connolly, CoBaAB).
  • Lacking grant links: Anatomy & Physiology Lab, Tobacco Use Research Lab (auto-extracted, not yet tied to a grant).
  • Lacking provenance: none material — every candidate carries source_file + evidence_snippet.
  • Lacking verification: all §3 candidates are unverified (no resource page / verification record).

  1. CDM "Labs & Facilities" web capture and CSH lab directory — directly enumerates physical labs/equipment; would promote the 5+ candidate labs and seed equipment inventories.
  2. Faculty lab websites for the unregistered PIs: Connolly (CSH), Huzaifa (CDM-006/Assisted Locomotion), Ramaraj (CoBaAB), Ramsay (Immersion Lab) — convert candidate labs → pages with people + equipment.
  3. HPCC / research-computing service pages — itemize HPC nodes, storage, and instrumentation (equipment layer, currently empty).
  4. College of Communication site — VARC lab.
  5. Core facilities / shared-instrumentation catalogs (microscopy, fabrication, machine shop, makerspace) — the single highest-value untapped source for the equipment/instrumentation gap.
  6. De-prioritize further aggregate ORS program reports (paid leave, URAP, internal-grant) for infrastructure purposes — they are administrative.

Summary counts (since main baseline 3169eb15)

Metric Count
New hard-technology resources promoted (new pages) 0
New hard-technology candidates preserved ~9 DePaul labs/clinics (+3 external institutes/labs)
New equipment candidates preserved 0
New facility candidates preserved 7 labs + 2 clinics (1 external partner matched: Argonne)
New infrastructure relationships created (grant→facility) 6 (GRL-013/015/016/017/018/019 → 4 facilities)
New infrastructure relationships preserved as candidates 4 (REL-001/002/004/010) + 1 rejected (REL-003)
New reciprocal links created ~1 explicit (CDM-011) + people.yaml person↔office pairs
Missing reciprocal links identified ≥6 (3 promoted facilities + candidate labs)
Context: total grants 39 → 922 (+883)
Context: new people +1 (PER-118)
Context: new resource pages 0