Skip to content

RAGMap prototype answer

Question: Who appears to bridge multiple technical resource areas using direct evidence?

Generated: 2026-05-31 17:05:39 UTC

Pipeline: python3 scripts/ragmap_answer_prototype.py

Graph filters used

  • include_in_graph=true only
  • Exclude UNI-001 from hub and bridge rankings
  • Exclude evidence_level ∈ {topical, administrative, excluded, affiliation} from technical counts
  • Person–resource hub/bridge counts use direct edges only (affiliation is not collaboration)
  • Person–grant edges are not treated as facility use
  • Person–publication / person–output edges are not facility use unless a publication–resource or output–resource link exists

Answer summary

0 people have direct person–resource edges to resources in two or more prefixes (excluding UNI-001). This is not collaboration inference—only documented director/lead/contact/support roles.

Supporting entities

None.

Limitations

  • Affiliation and collaborator (topical) edges are excluded.
  • Bridging EXT + UNI is not the same as bridging CDM + CSH hardware labs.
  • Coauthorship and grant PI edges are not used.

Warnings

  • Do not treat bridge list as a collaborator recommendation without reading evidence text.
  • External partners (EXT prefix) may appear as bridges without DePaul facility co-use.

Suggested follow-up data

  • Publication–resource links tying people to shared instrumentation.
  • Explicit collaborator edges with facility-specific evidence (rare).